Ian & Stuart's Australian Mac: Not for Sale/Another.not.for.sale (Australia).iso/Dr. Doyle/Spirit/Channeling/Spiritual Sovereignty

Text File | 1994-10-08 | 54KB | 989 lines

                             SPIRITUAL SOVEREIGNTY

   Germane through Lyssa Royal

   February 21, 1992

   [IMAGE] Lyssa Royal

   Lyssa Royal, an internationally recognized channel whose work is seen
   regularly in such publications as Connecting Link and Sedona Journal
   of Emergence! is the co-author of several books including: Prism of
   Lyra, Future Sex, the forthcoming Visitors from Within, and is a
   featured channel in the Sedona Vortex Guidebook. She has been seen on
   national and international television and has channeled for thousands
   across the world in Japan, Australia, the Yucatan and the United
   States, and was recently featured with other well-known channels at
   the International Channeling Conference in Crete.

   Germane, a group consciousness energy, states that "his" orientation
   is from a realm of integration that does not have a clear-cut
   density/dimensional level. The term "germane" in the English language
   means "significant relevance" or "coming from the same source".
   Germane therefore chose this term to somewhat personify his energy.
   Neither male nor female, he views us as evolving to become him as we
   begin the process of physical, emotional, mental and spiritual
   integration, which leads us back to the Source of All. For more
   information, please contact Royal Priest Research, P.O. Box 12626,
   Scottsdale, AZ 85267 [phone].

   NOTE: Within this transcript several legal terms are used. Following
   is a definition of these terms so the information may be clear to the
   reader. These terms are not interchangeable.


     _________________________________________________________________

   Contents:
          + Spiritual and Emotional Sovereignty
          + Sovereignty and the Constitution
          + Ways You Enslave Yourselves
          + Pleiadian Philosophy - 100% Responsibility
          + Anger Is Not Taking Responsibility
          + Process Inner Reality, Then Change Outer Choice
          + Dealing with Victimhood
          + Processing with Comfort
          + Becoming Sovereign Includes Integrity, Education and
            Discernment
          + Victimhood In Daily Life
          + The Constitution Always Leads to Sovereignty
          + Extraterrestrial Background
          + Forefathers Taught Victim/Aggressor Roles
          + Rights and Privileges
          + Sovereignty Techniques


     _________________________________________________________________

   Privilege: A privilege is permission - granted by a higher authority
   to carry out an activity. When gaining a privilege, one must often
   give up a natural right. Example: According to the U.S. Constitution,
   people have a right to travel public roads in their private vehicles.
   However, when they enter into a contract with the state to receive a
   drivers license, they exchange their constitutional right to travel
   for a state-granted privilege to drive, and are thus subject to the
   stipulations of the state (auto insurance, realm of integral
   registration, etc.).

   Rights: Rights are natural states of being, whether recognized or
   unrecognized, that all humans inherently possess. (For example, the
   right to procreate or grow food is obvious, but not necessarily
   recognized by documentation.) Some rights are recognized in the U.S.
   Constitution, such as the right to travel. Rights are nullified when
   they are exchanged for privileges, such as when one enters into a
   contract with the state through a marriage or drivers license. When
   natural rights are exchanged for privileges granted from an outside
   source, one becomes a nonsovereign, or a subject of the authority who
   has given the privilege.

   Civil Law: Civil law is the structure that organizes, controls,
   punishes and rewards individuals who have given up their rights in
   exchange for privileges.

   Common Law: Common law, a law of sovereigns, is based on the idea of
   self-responsibility and natural rights. It is recognized under the
   Constitution as being the natural state of being. Only in the last
   century has common law been methodically exchanged for civil law.

   Sovereignty: Sovereignty is the state of being achieved when one
   operates only under common law, or has taken total self-responsibility
   for their lives.

Spiritual and Emotional Sovereignty

   Germane: All right, greetings to you. First off we would like to say
   that spiritual sovereignty is the result of emotional sovereignty. In
   addressing the idea of emotional sovereignty we will indicate how
   spiritual sovereignty can be attained.

   Here are some definitions of emotional sovereignty. First of all, it
   means liberation, freedom. A state of emotional sovereignty is
   obtained when a person recognizes, both intellectually and
   emotionally, that he/she is the total creator of his/her reality and
   has sole responsibility for him/herself.

   These concepts sound like simplistic metaphysics, for many lecturers
   and channels espouse them. However we are going to take you deeper
   into the areas where you have not attained emotional sovereignty,
   areas where there is a disguised play being acted on the stage, and
   the playbill says one thing but the message the play carries says
   another. We will point out contradictions in the philosophies on your
   planet, in your own thinking, and in the systems that you have set up.
   This is to show you that even though you claim you want spiritual and
   emotional sovereignty, you are actually perpetuating its opposite.

   There are many points we will bring up that, taken separately, may
   look as if they are not connected. However we're going to link them to
   show you just how deep is your sense of non-sovereignty and how
   ancient is this state.

Sovereignty and the Constitution

   Let us first talk about things that are very close to you here on the
   earth plane, most notably, issues of an educational, political or
   religious nature. Many on your planet feel that these ideas are some
   of the cornerstones of your existence. As an example, many individuals
   speak very highly of the Constitution of the United States and how it
   guarantees freedom for all people. Yet some things have happened since
   1776 that have gradually pulled the wool over your eyes, shall we say,
   so that you are saying one thing but acting out its opposite. Now, in
   no way are we pointing a finger; in no way are we telling you you're
   bad or wrong. All the systems set up on your world, dating back
   thousands of years, were taught to you by your forefathers (to be more
   specific, your extraterrestrial forefathers), who have been grappling
   with these same issues themselves. They looked to your planet as a
   place where perhaps these issues could be healed once and for all.
   Thus there is in no way a judgment of you.

   Your mass consciousness has reached out to us, to other levels of
   consciousness, asking for assistance to move through this most
   difficult time. This is a time when you can enslave yourselves more
   deeply or where you can finally achieve your sovereignty. Within the
   next 50 years you will decide the direction you wish to go. We and
   others have answered your call, and we give you our perspectives on
   some of these things to assist you. Should you choose to use these
   perspectives, that is up to you.

   We will, of course, call on those present for assistance with some of
   the historical facts. We are somewhat limited in the method of
   channeling that we use with this vehicle to bring through specific
   historical information that she herself does not possess. Thus if
   anything we say is historically inaccurate, you may correct us,
   although historical accuracy is actually irrelevant.

Ways You Enslave Yourselves

   We're going to talk about how there are many things occurring within
   your reality right now that keep you enslaved. We will use a very
   simple analogy: In your society you have set it up so that marriage is
   a socially sanctioned institution, and in some instances legally
   sanctioned as well. If you operate within the parameters of marriage,
   you are led to believe that you have certain privileges. Now, it is a
   fact not well known that when you enter into a contract such as
   marriage, there are issues other than marriage. When you sign anything
   that has to do with a state or a local government, there are times
   when you actually relinquish certain rights. When you sign a marriage
   contract, you give up your right to educate your children the way you
   see fit, giving the state authority to educate them. Thus you give up
   your right to educate your own children (depending on the laws of each
   individual state).

   These things are not clearly understood when one enters this contract
   - but it's important to note that nobody is trying to "get" you.
   Because of your own deep-seated emotional beliefs, you have created
   covert ways to keep yourself stuck in these dysfunctional emotional
   beliefs. What is covert is what you're doing to yourselves. Do you
   follow so far?

   Another example, one written into your Constitution, is the right to
   drive. When you apply for a drivers license, you give up your right
   and are thereby granted a privilege. But because you exist under the
   Constitution, you have a right to drive. (Bold)I want to clarify that
   it is basically a right to travel on the roads. The Supreme Court has
   ruled that this includes one's personal automobile.

   Because that is your right, you don't have to do anything to exercise
   it other than to exist. However, when you enter into a contract (a
   drivers license), you relinquish that right and subject yourselves to
   laws that are made regarding the privilege you are now given. As
   teenagers you are taught that you take drivers education, apply for a
   license and then you can legally drive. Of course, when you get your
   license you are then subject to the laws about automobile insurance,
   vehicle registration, the laws of the road, etc. Your traveling then
   becomes a privilege instead of a natural right, correct? You're not
   taught that you have a choice.

   Another example is common-law marriage -- marriage in the eyes of God
   (never mind the piece of paper) - retaining your rights to educate
   your children. Or you can sign a contract and thus no longer educate
   your own children. You and your spouse become legally bound to each
   other and are given certain supposed privileges. You are not told you
   have choice, it is taken for granted that you get married and sign the
   papers. There is seldom conscious thought about alternatives that may
   better serve your situation.

   When you go for your first drivers license, you are not told you have
   a choice under the Constitution, which your forefathers wrote and
   which you all co-created. You are not told you have a choice either to
   retain your natural rights as a citizen or to sign away those rights
   in exchange for certain privileges and all the laws those privileges
   are subject to. If you retain, for instance, your common-law rights
   -your natural rights under the Constitution - even if you are caught
   by a policeman for speeding there may be a hassle but constitutionally
   you still have the right to travel. You can be fined or punished only
   when you have given away your rights in exchange for privileges; then
   you are bound by the laws. Are we correct?

   (Bold)Not having a drivers license, according to the law, does not
   give you the right to violate the safety laws. According to the
   Supreme Court you are still subject to the speed laws and other rules
   of the road. The punishment for not having a drivers license differs
   from state to state. In Arizona, as you said, it is simply a fine. In
   other states it can be jail. So there is a wide variety in the type of
   crime as well as punishment. A misdemeanor in Arizona could be a
   felony in another state.



Pleiadian Philosophy - 100% Responsibility

   The point we wish to make is that when you give up your power to
   another person or an institution to keep yourself in line, you have
   given up your sovereignty. Let us give you an example using the
   Pleiadian philosophy. Let's say that the Pleiadians want to drive
   cars on your planet. Their philosophy is one of total self -
   responsibility, meaning if they hit someone, they are responsible. If
   they are hit by someone else, they are responsible for that, too. If
   they are in some type of automobile dispute, each person involved
   takes responsibility for his position. There are never any victims.

   In that case what you call your civil law is not applicable. Civil law
   (the way you set up your system on your planet) ensures that someone
   is a victim, that someone must be held responsible because no one is
   willing to take responsibility for themselves. Your system reinforces
   the idea that someone is at fault, and therefore there must be someone
   to punish you - because you are unable or unwilling to take total
   responsibility for your own reality. Thus victimhood is continually
   perpetuated. How many times a day do you see an automobile insurance
   commercial on television where the injured person says, "It wasn't my
   fault. Don't I deserve something for my pain and suffering?" This is
   the attitude, the dynamic, that is constantly being perpetuated.

   We recognize that you may not want to change overnight - it may be too
   much of a shock. However, right now the majority of people are unaware
   that they are perpetuating the cycle of fear, non-responsibility,
   blame and victimhood. Imagine what it would be like to drive daily and
   100% of the time know that you are creating your reality, know that
   everything that happens to you is created by you for a very specific
   reason. If you get into an automobile accident, if you hit someone,
   you take responsibility for it. Even if you are hit from behind, for
   instance, you recognize that it is within your reality only because
   you have drawn it there.

   Imagine a society that holds these beliefs. It would have no
   victimhood; it would be a society totally willing to take
   responsibility for everything that happens to it. You are working
   toward this, but because you have not recognized the trap you have set
   up for yourself, it is almost as if you are running on a treadmill
   trying to get down the street. Once you recognize how deep is the
   structure you've created, you will be able to start actively changing
   it.

Anger Is Not Taking Responsibility

   Some of you have already been doing this. However, some of the ways
   you are trying to change it, to get out of the structure, are really
   dragging you deeper into it. Let's say you have someone who studies
   the Constitution and realizes that there is a contradiction between
   what was set up and what is going on now. Let's say this person has a
   lot of victimhood energy. They become angry about the situation and
   because they are not willing to look at the source of their anger -
   their own inner victimhood, their own relinquishment of their
   sovereignty - they externalize the victimization and see the system as
   the perpetrator.

   You then have someone who is angry and decides they're going to buck
   the system. Let's say they refuse to register their car, get
   automobile insurance or a drivers license. In their anger, their
   intent is to make a statement - to cause trouble. This creates
   resistance toward the very structure they are struggling to pull away
   from. All it does is balance the intensity of the structure. It will
   not free them but keep them chained to it. The person never looks at
   the real reason for the anger - the relinquishment of personal
   sovereignty - but instead blames that loss on someone else. You can
   never be sovereign if you blame anyone else for anything. And whenever
   you do, the structure is kept in place.

   There are many individuals on your planet who feel they are engaged in
   good causes when they are acting in anger. But we tell you that anger
   will never solve the structural challenges of your society. It can
   never break the structure. The question is, what will break the
   structure? First: an intelligent understanding of the structure
   itself, why it was created and how it is kept in place. After that it
   will be necessary to process any anger, martyrdom or victimhood that
   you feel, and be willing to act from your own integrity - not from
   anger or an intent to make a statement, but because it's the only
   thing you can do in your integrity.

   There are people at present who are starting to hear the voice of
   their conscience, who are processing their victimhood, who are
   beginning to see the true nature of the structure and how it was put
   there. And when they realize this in their own conscience, they can no
   longer keep it intact. They must follow their own integrity. In that
   choice to follow integrity - cleanly, clearly, with no anger - the
   structure begins to change. The issue is not the structure that is
   enslaving you, but the fact that you have allowed it to enslave you.
   If you can begin to understand why you've allowed this, why you've
   forgotten you put it here to begin with, then true sovereignty is
   right around the corner. Comments?

Process Inner Reality, Then Change Outer Choice

   (Audience participant): The entire insurance system - not just
   automobile insurance, but life insurance, health insurance,
   malpractice insurance, the entire spectrum - seems to be an automatic
   relinquishment of sovereignty.

   Yes. (Audience participant): I would think that anyone daring to
   create their own reality couldn't participate in the insurance scheme.


   If you 100% absolutely believe you create your reality and know it,
   you cannot participate in the insurance idea. (Audience participant):
   I guess I'm bringing it up because it seems to be one of the easiest
   first steps to take. If someone is ready to regain their sovereignty,
   to take back their power, it would seem to me that facing this
   insurance issue would be a good place to start. You just stop paying
   your premiums.

   We understand what you are saying, except the person has to be very
   clear within. We would never suggest that someone stop paying their
   premiums, because if they still fear an accident, they will draw the
   accident to their doorway. They will not go through the process of
   healing by withdrawing the insurance. What we mean is that you will
   not heal this issue by withdrawing your insurance first and then
   processing. You will heal it by processing it to the point of
   integrity which leads you to withdraw your insurance. You follow?
   (Audience participant): I follow, but I don't know if I agree yet. Can
   we talk about it some more? [My wife] has had several patients who had
   to maintain irresponsibility because they have insurance that would
   not pay if they were found responsible.

   Exactly. You are rewarded when you're not responsible. (Audience
   participant): You said if someone is afraid, they haven't fully
   processed this thing about being responsible. If they maintain their
   insurance, that automatically keeps them in the state of
   irresponsibility. It seems to me you have got to take that step first.


   Recognize that your reality is not changed by changing the external
   things in order to get to the internal things. Your reality is changed
   by changing the internal things, which then affects the external
   things. (Audience participant): If someone maintains their insurance
   because they're afraid they're going to get in an accident or be
   punished if they're caught without it are you suggesting that they
   process the fear of the accident or punishment before they stop paying
   their premiums; that it will be much more effective if they first
   process the reasons why they feel they need this protection? Wouldn't
   it be easier to find those issues by taking the step and saying, "The
   insurance isn't doing me any good. it is keeping me from my
   sovereignty," and stopping the insurance, allowing those issues to
   come up even more clearly?

   Some people may choose to do it that way. However, if you removed the
   physical thing [the insurance], they will simply transfer their inner
   feelings to something else. It won't solve or change anything.

   (Audience participant): The distinction, then, is that if they're not
   on the path, the insurance shouldn't be removed; if they get on the
   path, then that's another matter. This brings up something else, which
   is the locking of one's house and car. Obviously, if we create our own
   reality, then we have to create being robbed. It is amazing that
   someone could give their power to one piece of metal on a door that
   when locked makes them feel safe. What you're suggesting is that they
   should process the fear of being robbed before they leave the door
   unlocked. Is that correct?

   Yes, because if they process the fear first, one day there will be a
   welling of emotion, a feeling, a shift. The realization will come
   emotionally that they do not need to lock the doors anymore. That will
   not come in the same way if the attempt is to change the external
   before the internal. (Audience participant): It feels like I'm
   advocating taking a symbolic action - doing something, leaving the
   door open - not to hasten the process but to focus the process.

   Some people can work that way; the majority do not. Recognize that the
   human being is very adept at transferring issues, meaning that if they
   start leaving their doors open they're going to manifest the fear of
   invasion in another area of their life. It will always be there in
   various forms until they process the internal dynamics.

   We're certainly not disagreeing with you or with any decisions you
   have made in the past or the future. Obviously they've worked for you.
   As a whole, our recommendation is to deal with it internally before
   doing it in the external world.

Dealing with Victimhood

   Try to take a day and notice every time you are not being totally
   100% responsible for your reality. Try to notice whenever you fear
   being a victim. If you are completely honest with yourself, you're
   going to see it often that day. A lot of it is a quite unconscious
   patterning that is in some ways dormant, meaning that it doesn't
   affect you negatively. There are many individuals who put a lot of
   energy into the idea of victimhood. Those individuals might have a
   very difficult time with some of the concepts we are talking about
   because it requires you to give up ever seeing yourself as a victim.

   That means recognizing whenever you reward yourself for pain,
   suffering, or anything that is not of service to you in a positive,
   exciting way. Recognize what you are doing, such as letting the
   insurance companies pay your medical bills only because you were not
   to blame. You are rewarded by an outside entity if you are not to
   blame - that concept is totally incompatible with the ultimate concept
   of common law and of spiritual and emotional sovereignty.

   The structures on your planet are in place and you're struggling
   against them to change them, but you can't see what you're struggling
   against. The challenge now is to begin, in the darkness, to make out
   the shape that you have created to enslave yourself. We cannot express
   to you how powerful the changes will be on your planet when you begin
   relinquishing these old structures. You will do this layer by layer.
   Sometimes you may think you're at the end, but there will be another
   five layers to go. It's a very deep process you've created to protect
   yourself, believing that you yourselves need to be taken care of,
   protected, told what to do.

Processing with Comfort

   (Audience participant): There is an old saying that may have become a
   premise in our lives: "If you're not part of the solution, then you're
   part of the problem." In other words, as long as someone is
   contributing to that structure - a system opposed to our sovereignty -
   they are part of the problem. It seems pretty polarized. Ultimately,
   there are no problems; it's all growth/challenge. Everything is
   actually neutral.

   That idea is too dualistic from our point of view. (Audience
   participant): I'm involved in a quiet court case about my refusal to
   get a privilege license from the government to run my business. It
   doesn't feel like I'm doing it in anger, although four years ago when
   I was challenging the drivers license issue there was anger and
   conspiracy and all that this involved. This time it's simply that I
   cannot agree to pay the government protection money like the Mafia
   demands for not harassing you. Operating a business is a right, not a
   privilege. Would you recommend to someone who operates a business to
   renew their license, or to process this first before they take that
   step?

   Our recommendation is to totally and absolutely feel comfortable
   processing before any steps are taken, because if it is done with
   uncertainty or fear, it will add to the strength of the structure
   instead of helping to dissolve it. That is the way we see it; we are
   certainly open for disagreement. (Audience participant): I think there
   has to be a certain amount of processing that occurs anyway, because
   this structure has become so ingrained that we have to face the fact
   that when someone is ready to take back their personal power, to
   regain their sovereignty, one of the possibilities is jail.

   Yes.

Becoming Sovereign Includes Integrity, Education and Discernment

   (Audience participant): I could serve time in jail on this business
   license issue, because it is a "crime" I have committed. In some
   states, the drivers license issue could lead to jail. There is also
   jail for the insurance issue in some states. So people have to get to
   the point where they recognize the consequences of their actions on
   both sides - the consequences of having given up their sovereignty and
   continuing and perpetrating this state - and the consequences of
   taking their sovereignty back.

   Yes. There is a gray point between the black and the white where the
   transformation will occur. The consequence for bowing down to the
   system is that you keep the structure intact There are definitely
   consequences for pursuing the sovereignty idea, because you may be
   punished. However, what it comes down to is acting from your
   integrity. In your own inner searchings, when you find what your
   integrity is guiding you to do, your sovereignty lies in following
   that.

   As you are soul-searching, one of the key ideas is educating yourself
   on the Constitution and as much law as you can; educating yourself
   beyond the textbooks that the structures provide for you, because the
   textbooks are written within the structure. You must educate yourself
   from the source. That is where one of the big challenges lie, because
   many of you have not been able to tell the difference between
   textbooks written by the structures and "clean" information from the
   source that leads you into sovereignty. It is a process of
   discernment.

Victimhood In Daily Life

   We don't want to sound harsh, but your social brainwashing is
   phenomenal. For instance, individuals who call themselves patriotic
   Americans have certain beliefs: "Patriotic Americans pay their taxes."
   However, when you research it you will find that the taxation system
   as it exists now is not only contrary to the Constitution but is in
   some ways illegal. Are we correct?

   (Audience participant): You're absolutely correct. The tax system is
   not even part of the Constitution. The States never ratified it.

   Why do you think your early Americans had the Tea Party? Because of
   taxation without representation. If you do your research, you will
   find that the taxation system as it is set up now is illegal. You have
   said that the Sixteenth Amendment was not ratified.

   (Audience participant): The Sixteenth Amendment - income tax - was
   never ratified.

   So the premise that patriotic Americans pay their taxes is a
   distortion of the original intent of the Constitution. The second
   premise is, "All good Americans go to war when they are called." Think
   about this: Can you ever be of service to yourself or to your country
   if you are doing something that you believe is wrong? Individuals who
   unquestioningly follow that premise may be in direct opposition to
   what they feel. A corollary to the second premise, "All good Americans
   go to war to fight the enemy," declares that you can be a victim, that
   there is an enemy, and that there is someone out there you must
   defeat. This idea of good and bad, enemies and heroes, will not free
   you from the structure. Instead it keeps you enslaved.

   Now, examine day-to-day things. For instance, there are laws that make
   you wear a helmet when driving a motorcycle - protecting you - because
   it is assumed that you are not capable of protecting yourself, of
   being responsible for yourself. So something is imposed upon you.
   There are hand-gun laws - an attempt to control - because there is the
   belief in perpetrators and victims. This belief is constantly fed.
   Keeping drugs illegal is another false attempt to protect "innocent"
   people.

   All of these systems you have set up prevent you from understanding
   what sovereignty is. Sovereignty is taking total, 100% responsibility
   for yourself as an individual, for your community and for your planet
   as a whole.

The Constitution Always Leads to Sovereignty

   (Audience participant): We've been talking about present-day issues.
   Will you discuss some of the history of sovereignty? For instance, the
   founders of this country - George Washington, Benjamin Franklin,
   Thomas Jefferson - were all Masons.

   That has Sirian connections. The Sirians were the ones who originally
   tried to liberate you.

   (Audience participant): A great distrust for Masons has grown among
   many of the patriot movements around this country and among people who
   claim to be seeking their own sovereignty. They take issue with the
   Masons because of the latter's involvement with the Trilateral
   Commission conspiracy and so forth. There is a dichotomy that has
   developed. Do you have any comments about the intentions of the
   Masons, of the Founding Fathers - anything pertinent to the founding
   fathers' understanding of our sovereignty and what they expected to
   accomplish with the Constitution?

   We have to bring your extraterrestrial forefathers into this because
   there is a very direct parallel between your Founding Fathers, Masonry
   and the Sirian group that attempted to liberate you. When the Sirians
   attempted your liberation, they assumed that you needed help. Right
   there is a sense of inequality. Yet some of their methods were used by
   the Founding Fathers as well. Some of the Sirians - the genetic
   engineers - put certain latent genetic codes in you that will soon be
   activated. This to ensure that you would eventually be triggered into
   certain types of understanding.

   Your Founding Fathers did the same thing. They were very, very clever.
   It's not visible to the eye, but the way the Constitution is written,
   if it collapses in upon itself, if it is perverted in any way, it will
   eventually turn around and work for your sovereignty instead of
   against it. Do you follow?

   (Audience participant): Is this an example of what you mean? Recently
   in Arizona the automobile insurance law was changed, and recent
   statistics show that only 50% of the people have insurance. To
   register your car now you must actually produce proof of your policy
   rather than just state that you have it. If you cancel it and are
   stopped by the police for any reason, they are told to take your
   license plates. This will occur over the next 12 months as people's
   registrations come up for renewaL Of course, insurance rates in this
   state have skyrocketed. The only response I can see to this whole
   process is that by the end of this year there are going to be so many
   people ticked off that they will demand their sovereignty. Thus the
   perversions of this issue will result in an increase of sovereignty,
   not a decrease. Is that what you're saying?

   Exactly. The more oppressive your structure becomes, the more
   individuals are going to feel the pressure. The more they will be
   spurred on to do their own research and the more they find out about
   their rights and their "privileges", then the more they will begin
   exercising their rights. It's not going to come by rejecting
   privileges; it's going to come by exercising rights. You see the
   difference?

   (Audience participant): Was the Founding Fathers' shrewdness totally
   conscious on their part?

   Let's say they didn't understand it to the point where they could
   explain it to you. It was a sensing - a knowingness and a guidance.
   They believed very firmly in what they were doing.

   It's necessary to understand that there is no bad guy in any of this.
   The Emancipation Proclamation, the abolition of slavery, has caused
   some of the shifting in a non-conscious way. You had a group of people
   who once had special laws written for them, and when they had to be
   integrated into society, the structure of the laws needed to change.
   Often the laws were written as an adaptation to a circumstance that
   had a lot of pressure around it. This adaptation was never checked and
   balanced with the Constitution; it was a pressured, in-the-moment
   expedient.

   Again, there's no bad guy here. It's just layer upon layer upon layer
   of distractions that have solidified the structure itself.

Extraterrestrial Background

   (Audience participant): I would like to pursue the concept of
   sovereignty among first- and second-class citizens. You mentioned
   slavery, but I'm thinking of the white man coming into North America
   and driving the "Indians" before him, viewing them as inferior being
   would you trace that attitude to extraterrestrial roots, back to the
   time when the original Lyrans left Lyra, came here and then later went
   to the Pleiades? This was when they found Earth and populated it. Then
   along came this new group of Lyrans and the Sirians to make this their
   showcase, their genetic experiment and so forth. Didn't the Lyrans and
   Sirians recognize the "property rights" of the Pleiadians? What was
   their attitude in terms of property rights, private ownership? The
   closest analogy is that of the white man and the Native Americans.
   What was the thinking at that time in terms of sovereignty? Did the
   Lyrans and Sirians feel they had the right to come in and take over?

   Recognize that your forefathers were struggling with some of the same
   issues then that you are now, and they had not resolved the idea of
   property rights. It was basically the same as it is now on your world:
   the strongest one --the one with the most toys - wins. In that
   particular situation you're talking about, the Lyrans did not drive
   the future Pleiadians away; the future Pleiadians chose to leave.
   However, had the Lyrans continued their aggressive interactions, they
   would have eventually driven out those Pleiadians had the latter
   stayed.

   Ownership is based on what you can seize, in terms of this galactic
   history. Recognize that when people feel they have to take something
   from someone else, they must in some way believe themselves to be
   lacking; they must in some way be deficient in their sovereignty. When
   one is truly sovereign, coexisting with other sovereigns, there are no
   property disputes, there are no ownership problems. To describe this
   type of reality is very difficult, because to some people it sounds
   like communism. But that is not at all what we are speaking of.

Forefathers Taught Victim/Aggressor Roles

   Unfortunately we cannot tell you that your forefathers had wonderful
   and wise ways of dealing with these things, because they didn't. You
   learned what you are experiencing now from them. You learned from them
   that the strongest rule, that some are victims and others aggressors.
   Even to this day, in the collective human soul there is the belief
   that you don't own this planet. This belief is what has delayed you
   for so long in taking a global stand environmentally and socially. You
   still don't believe you own the planet or that you exist and co-create
   with the planet on equal terms. You have no concept of your own
   sovereignty. In an attempt to figure out what sovereignty is, you take
   from others.

   (Audience participant): It seems to me that our misperception of our
   own sovereignty is exactly what the Lyrans wanted us to believe,
   especially in light of the fact that it was the Sirians that had to
   come in and free us. There seems to be an extraterrestrial assumption
   that we are inferior, like the Caucasian assumption about Blacks. Is
   there an extraterrestrial belief that we don't possess any rights and
   that we exist as Homo Sapiens only as a privilege granted by our
   creators (the ETs)? Has our entire pattern as a species been that of
   existence by privilege and not by right?

   Only extraterrestrials who are insecure with their own sovereignty
   would believe that. However, your forefathers and the offspring of
   your forefathers have evolved quite significantly since that time.

Rights and Privileges

   We would like to define the difference between rights and privileges.
   These words are not being used interchangeably. Privilege is something
   that is granted to you from another source. Right is inherent by your
   existence, innately. For instance, you have a right to celebrate God.
   But you're given the "privilege" of worshipping God when you go to
   church and pay your dues.

   (Audience participant): We have talked a great deal about the nature
   of the agreement between the Zetas and Homo Sapiens. If there is an
   assumption that we exist as a privilege (whether it's our belief or
   the ETs), this contract, whether it be a contract between us as a
   species with the Zetas or individual agreements with the Zetas, is
   similar to the drivers license issue. Is it exercised from our side
   without conscious knowledge of the consequences?

   Absolutely. You have used the term implied consent. Because you
   believe your existence is a privilege, then your interactions with the
   Zetas are subject to the laws of that privilege in the masses' belief
   system, and some of those laws you may not even be aware of.

   (Audience participant): Then it is like my having a drivers license
   and my belief that driving is a privilege granted by a higher
   authority. This "higher" authority grants me the privilege of using
   the roads, using an automobile, etc. By accepting that privilege, I've
   implied my consent; therefore I must agree to have insurance,
   registration and not let someone else use my car who does not have
   those things. All of this happens because I have accepted the
   privilege rather than exercised my right?

   When you already have the right to travel automatically.

   (Audience participant): And so the Zetas, of course, read our
   unconscious minds and know that we think our existence is a privilege.
   Therefore when we ask, "Why are you doing this?" they say, "We have
   the right".

   Yes, because you have implied your consent by playing out the role of
   a helpless species. That's one way of looking at it. If you were
   sovereign, no one could have rights over you, but since you're not
   active sovereigns, someone assumes rights over you. There's always
   hierarchy in a nonsovereign atmosphere, but in a sovereign atmosphere
   there is never a hierarchy.

   As a species, you have the right to interact with your galactic
   neighborhood, to know your heritage. You have a right to explore all
   levels of consciousness and reality. You have set up privileges to
   protect yourself from some of the scary things because you feel
   nonsovereign. And as you build this elaborate structure (based on
   privileges and not rights), you start distorting your own version of
   the universe. Those rights that we just mentioned are always active,
   but if you are not sovereign, you can't interface with them.
   Therefore, you will act out your right to interact with other species
   through the privilege structure you have set up, which will be equal
   to your belief systems.

   To put this in another way, you will always act out your right to
   travel, but because you are not sovereign, you must act out that right
   according to the structure of the privileges. Therefore, you act out
   your right to travel through the privilege of your license, your
   insurance and your registration. Do you follow? This is a very
   significant point.

   With the Zetas, you will always act out your rights as a species. Your
   rights will always be there, but you can't see them. You can't know
   your rights unless you are sovereign. Therefore, you must act
   according to the nonsovereign privileges, which seem as if they are
   given to you by someone else. Therefore, because you believe you are
   not sovereign and can be victimized, you will act out your right to
   communicate with other species through that belief system and the
   structure that allows you to be victims.

   You are, in fact, always in touch with your rights. You've cloaked
   them, you've twisted them, you've distorted them into your privileges
   and have come to believe that privileges are rights, when they are
   really two different things. In terms of the Zetas, the only framework
   within which you could interact with them has been one of inequality,
   hierarchy, manipulation, control or fear because those are the very
   structures upon which your society is built. Do you follow?

   (Audience participant): Obviously, one of the things that keeps us
   from claiming our sovereignty is our religious structure. This concept
   that God is sovereign and that we are his subjects agrees with the
   early ET influence; this is what they wanted us to believe. Can a true
   sovereign ever have subjects?

   No. Absolutely not. If the religious structure broke apart on your
   planet, every other structure would collapse. No other structure could
   support itself after that.

   (Audience participant): We have played that out in our society. We
   have called people "subjects." We have called a baron or king a
   "sovereign," and they have had subjects.

   However, to some degree you are also interlinked. In only one sense
   are we saying this: You could never truly be sovereign unless everyone
   else in your reality bubble were also. That doesn't mean everybody in
   your world, but everyone with whom you interact. This is one way of
   looking at it. The sovereign king can never truly be sovereign, in the
   sense that he can't be sovereign if he's dealing with inequality.

   (Audience participant): I have something to clarify. Let's say I am
   truly sovereign and my friend is not. What if I see him as a complete
   sovereign, even though he is playing the role of a subject?

   You see him as a complete sovereign because it's all the sovereignty
   you can allow yourself to see. Recognize that there's not a point of
   100% sovereignty, just like you can't limit yourself to the amount of
   love you can feel today. There's no end to sovereignty. So your
   ability to see sovereignty reflected in other people is limited by how
   much you can see in yourself. It's ever-expanding. Thus you may look
   at your friend and see a total sovereign. He may not feel sovereign;
   you are simply mirror reflections for each other. As the entire planet
   plays out the sovereignty issue, you will help each other. You're all
   intricately intertwined, though you would like to think you're not.
   You're not dependent on the other person for your attainment of
   sovereignty, but at the same time their reflection of sovereignty to
   you is crucial. Obviously this transformation into fourth density is
   very much a part of claiming your sovereignty.

Sovereignty Techniques

   (Audience participant): This is such a widespread issue - through
   religion and politics and economics and sex and relationships - is
   there anything in particular that someone might do to start on this
   road?

   Each person will be different, but you can start by identifying the
   areas of your life in which you are blatantly nonsovereign. Look at
   those. Understand why that is so. We'll give you some hints: First,
   look at your religious structure. Look at your political structure,
   your economics and your education system. Then look at your legal
   system. (Those suggestions are going to open a can of worms.) Each
   person will go through the process of attaining sovereignty in his/her
   own way. We would suggest that you obtain any research material you
   can. There are schools that teach these principles (and we're not
   referring to metaphysical schools; we're referring to schools that
   teach common law). That's a start for some people. There's no
   structure to follow on your planet to become sovereign, because it's
   not anything you've ever experienced. You are creating the structure
   as you go. (Audience participant): Can there ultimately be a
   structure?

   In a sense, there cannot be. Each has to do it in his own way.

   (Audience participant): I like the idea of becoming sovereign and I
   want to begin taking steps. I found blocks to that in my Life that
   have shown me I am not truly sovereign.

   You don't feel truly sovereign, you mean. (Audience participant): At
   various times I have found myself in a position of borrowing money, or
   using certain rationales to renew my drivers license. Sometimes it's
   very difficult to be sovereign without your own piece of land.

   Here is a case where if you forced this on the physical level you
   would not accomplish anything, because the internal ideas must first
   be processed.

   (Audience participant): That was my frustration. I found myself
   wanting to take too large a step, which may have been self-sabotage on
   my part Does that make sense?

   Yes, because to some degree the self-sabotage would be the
   reinforcement of your identity as a failure.

   (Audience participant): And as a "subject" using these terms.

   Yes. And if you are willing to take specific steps to achieve that,
   you do what you can. You did some very valuable things internally.

   (Audience participant): Internally, but I am concerned about my
   external reality, because ultimately to be sovereign you must take
   physical action. I imagine a lot of people are in a situation similar
   to mine.

   You are correct. But there is never a need to force it. Force implies
   resistance; resistance is what makes force necessary. We would always
   suggest that you do what you can. What you are attempting to do on
   your planet with this sovereignty idea is to stop keeping the dynamic
   of polarity in place. Therefore, when you go inside to process and
   then take the steps from your realizations, you are not using force.
   Force is not needed; thus there is no resistance. It is much more
   thorough, much more transformational. Do what you can. Keep
   processing. There are small steps being taken. Recognize that the
   shift in your own belief system is extremely powerful, not only for
   you but for mass consciousness in general.

   Let's give you an example. Let's say you went to war. Which has more
   impact - 100,000 men burning their draft cards out of protest or
   100,000 men shifting their consciousness? It is tempting to say that
   burning draft cards has more impact, but that is not the case. Those
   people who burned their draft cards may be burning them out of anger
   or fear, not necessarily out of a change in consciousness.

   (Audience participant): If 100,000 men burn their draft cords and
   don't go to war, are you saying it is not as effective as a change in
   consciousness- even though 50, 000 of those men may actually continue
   to participate in the war (if that's possible with the change in
   consciousness)? I used to think that the physical demonstration of
   burning the draft card, for example, was the most important step that
   could be taken. But you are saying that the change in consciousness of
   the draftees is much more important than the physical action of
   burning the draft card.

   Yes. The change in consciousness is much more impacting than you can
   possibly imagine. Let's say there are 100,000 people burning those
   draft cards. Maybe some men are burning them because they are mad at
   their fathers, consciously or subconsciously. They don't care if they
   go to war; they're just mad at their fathers, and this is a way to
   vent that anger. If they're doing it out of anger they may have no
   idea why they are angry. If they delve into it, that's when they start
   changing their consciousness. Someone who gets a drivers license after
   being educated about rights, privileges and sovereignty has taken an
   immense step - because now he's not doing it out of denial or
   ignorance. Instead he is doing it with a shift of consciousness, doing
   it consciously.

   Let's say that 100,000 men burn their draft cards because of a change
   in consciousness. But in this little story let's say they were forced
   to go to war anyway. Having those 100,000 men with that change of
   consciousness in the army will have a tremendous impact on the mass
   consciousness of the army itself.

   (Audience participant): I think we saw that in the Iraqi conflict and
   that may have manifested as very few deaths on one side. Even though
   there were lots of Iraqi deaths, there could have been ten times that
   number.

   There was most certainly a shift in consciousness in terms of the
   troops that went to Iraq. Many went not because they believed in the
   conflict, but because they felt in some way that their energy, their
   consciousness, would be useful. Therefore, to judge a man for going to
   war when you do not know his motivations actually helps to maintain
   the structure of dysfunction rather than disintegrate it.

   (Audience participant): If the consciousness shifts in these 100,000
   men before they go off to war, they're not going to burn their draft
   cards out of anger. Instead they are going to realize precisely what
   step binds them to the Military. It is not the draft nor the
   induction, but the taking of the oath.

   Which they do voluntarily.

   (Audience participant): The insidious thing is that the government and
   the Military do not point that out. They tell you that it's the
   induction that turns a Civilian into a Military person.

   You are led to believe that, yes. We want to clarify what you said.
   There may be some confusion, and this is a very important point. You
   are led to believe, just like with the drivers and marriage licenses,
   that when you get that draft card and you are inducted, you must
   serve. However, you are never committed to serve until you raise your
   hand and take the oath, and the taking of the oath is voluntary.

   (Audience participant): Because being forced to take an oath is
   invalid.

   And so, as you said to the channel, there have been men who have not
   taken the oath and thus were dismissed from the induction and didn't
   have to serve.

   (Audience participant): Yes. It caused quite a commotion, but they
   were ultimately dismissed.

   The oath that you take to get into the military is a voluntary oath,
   and you have not known that. The marriage license is also a voluntary
   procedure, as is the drivers license. Paying taxes is a voluntary
   procedure. But you have led yourselves to believe they are not, and
   that is what is insidious.

   Let us go back to the beginning of this session before we close.
   Emotional sovereignty means understanding your reasons and motivations
   and healing those denied parts of you, which will eventually lead you
   to take 100% responsibility for your reality - and the result of that
   is spiritual sovereignty. You are on the path. You will create it.
   Have patience and trust yourselves.

   Much, much love, and goodnight.
     _________________________________________________________________

   @1992 by Royal Priest Research, All Rights Reserved. This manuscript
   may be copied for private distribution, but may not be sold.

   For more information on available tapes, transcripts, books, and
   videos, contact

Royal Priest Research at:
P.O. Box 12626, Scottsdale, AZ 85267.
[phone]. Fax: [phone].

   Love is the answer...

    [e-mail], [phone]


     _________________________________________________________________

   [IMAGE] [e-mail]